Kindergarten Merzbau
By Aaron Senitt, 2014
The Original Merzbau
Mr. Merz
Space for Growth
One Lays Pencil and Ruler Aside
Our classroom functions as a workshop. To accommodate as wide a range of interests as possible we stock standard Kindergarten art tools and materials such as paper, pipe cleaners, paint and paper but in addition we have tools such as hand drills, saws and hammers. We also stock materials less familiar to the Kindergarten room such as off-cuts of plumbing pipe, scraps of lumber, large sheets of cardboard and various cast away items. For connecting various pieces we make sure that we have effective materials such as plastic cable ties, construction grade tape, as well as nails and screws. Through our tools and materials it becomes “a place of trial building and development and thus of growth and change” (Malet, 1981, p.67). We work to maintain the essential balance necessary in Early Childhood Education between the expected routines and “…the anarchy of the workshop…” (Malet, p. 69). Wassili Luckhardt, a contemporary of Mies van der Rohe, encouraged architects of the day to put down their typical tools of the trade in order to find inspiration in the “accidental forms” that resulted from more malleable hands-on materials such as clay. (Mindrup, 2008, p.35). Though it is a cliché to recall the Proustian[vii] smell of a box freshly open crayons, there is truth to the notion that our deepest understanding of the world is sensual. Schwitters initially used materials such as scraps of wood and paper as a specific rebuff to the orthodox materials of the day (such as oil paint, canvas and brush), materials that he saw to be freighted with cultural baggage. He eventually realized however that all materials hold certain values and the materials he had found and gathered like a magpie had rich sensual and associative qualities such as texture and smell.
The Look and Feel of Kindergarten
Elementary schools have had a unique and enduring appearance; from the “school art” (Efland, 1976) that lines the walls to the colourful borders that frame the bulletin boards, our common notions of what elementary schools look like are still largely confirmed[viii]. Our kindergarten Merzbau was an accretion of spaces to play in, underneath and around (climbing on top was sadly discouraged). It was a sensory space, and a social space. Perplexing, but immediately engaging to visitors who entered our classroom; it did not follow the arrangements and appearances that configure many contemporary Kindergarten rooms. We built collaboratively, guided by Tom Bedard’s “dimensions for building in and around the sensory table” and “axioms for sensorimotor play”[ix], our construction was quickly established as an ongoing centre for children in the classroom (it stood for approximately 2 months), layered and overlapped with various additions, alterations and eventually, children’s drawings. Our Merzbau’s strength of purpose and appropriateness was apparent in the interactions between students and the space, and amongst one another; social, emotional and physical needs of the children were met through playing and working in the room. While inadvertently a challenge to the prevailing aesthetic codes of primary school, it gave them a place to feel safe, negotiate with one another, and be industrious - important values to foster in any classroom. Schwitters’ Merzbau is largely seen as his “Gesamkunstwerk”, or total work of art; our Merzbau was simultaneously an installation, performance and activity centre, a canvas for drawing, a provocation and a monument to remind us of the possibilities of the classroom.
Models of the World
Architects produce models for various purposes, models to instruct us, generative models that our imagination may inhabit, and models to replicate existing forms. During this project we looked at a series of reproduced images of building models, primarily early Modernist architecture based on modular construction (Mindrup, 2008). These images encouraged rich discussion with students, and as they imagined themselves inhabiting the various structures it also clearly influenced some of their own exquisite creations. Schwitters also made small sculptures, some of which have been studied as though they were architectural models (Mindrup, 2008). But what was his intention? Clearly these constructions were not created as working models to be copied directly, nor were they precise models of buildings that already existed. Schwitters indicated that the creation of these smaller constructions was a kind of childlike play, a “bauspiel” or building play. These smaller constructions suggest ways of working and looking, and I imagine Schwitters’ own experience in a Froebelian Kindergarten is revealed in some way through his work. As Kindergarten teachers, we model behaviour, we model language use, and we model skills to be developed. Children create their own models of the world as they understand it, using the various modes of expression that are available to them. In the same way that children’s drawings and constructions are attractive for the economy of means that they use; (a handful of pencils becomes a castle, two circles eyes, and so on), models represent concepts that are larger both conceptually and physically. In effect the “model is a bridge from the imagination to the materially grown up form” (Mindrup, p. 48), and in this case, perhaps back again.
Past Present
Norman Brosterman (1997) has notably outlined a revelatory connection between Kindergarten experiences of early 20th century artists and architects, and the formation of modernist abstract practice. Gwendolen Webster (2007) reminds us that the work Schwitters was engaged with over the course of his life has remained pertinent for artists and historians. While our Merzbau was never conceived of as an exercise in teaching art history, it became a lesson that was implicit and embodied in experience. In retrospect, it would have been superb to ask our ever receptive three, four and five year olds to articulate words such as “Schwitters”, “Froebel” and “Merzbau”, and undoubtedly, the words would have acquired unforeseen meanings as they were filtered through those unique brains, however in this event I allowed the ideas that I found so captivating to remain as conceptual and material scaffold for Kindergarten play. I called it our “setup”, and did not in fact bring the term Merzbau” to the children. Brosterman (1997) reminds us that “Kindergarten was play, and a good Kindergartener [teacher] made certain her little sprouts never thought otherwise-the theoretical underpinnings of the education were kept from children just as they are in any classroom situation.”. It is my feeling that a deeply reciprocal connection between contemporary Kindergarten practice and key examples of visual art, language, sculpture and architecture remains largely untapped (or perhaps undocumented). I am working to redirect the luminosity of Schwitters’ creative approaches forward into the visual and language arts of my Kindergarten classroom, while at the same time, hoping to extrapolate from that process a set of my own axioms that may be extended and applied toward the work of other artists. This work begins as always with questions: What does it mean to “invite” Schwitters to our classroom as an “invisible atelierista”? How exactly does the work of historical artistic predecessors (and contemporary artists alike) find footing in our classrooms? The seed planted long ago in the first Kindergartens may provide a guiding example.
Froebel, Schwitters, Crystalline Metaphors
As a young scholar, Friedrich Froebel spent an extended period of time studying crystals, and found through his analysis of geometric forms an apt metaphor and model for growth in general. He was able to confirm that the minute inner structures within crystals are mirrored by the outside appearance of the same mineral forms that we see and hold. Froebel extended this concept of inner and outer unity to all living things, and his description of a unified relationship between “the parts and the whole” was instrumental as he developed the philosophies that became the first Kindergarten (Brosterman, 1997). I see wide implications for this notion of the “parts and the whole” applied within Kindergarten today ranging from art, language, mathematics and social relationships; the impressively broad artistic oeuvre of Kurt Schwitters offers a wellspring of material that I will continue to explore in future work. Schwitters’ Merzbau was a kind of crystal, an initial form that grew larger yet retained that original kernel of form as it acquired more and more faceted parts. Our own Merzbau followed the same trajectory as well, the sensory tables remaining the core form and function of our growing construction. I have found a viable model for thought and growth within the work of Schwitters; my own metaphor for a unified approach to Kindergarten.
[i] In all, there were three successive Merzbauten (pl) built over the course of Schwitters’ life.
[ii] The “Kindergarten Merzbau” project is a project that I initiated, and then created collaboratively. It is important to note that my classroom is a working space with Junior and Senior Kindergarten children that I share with Cyndy Washington, an Early Childhood Educator I teach with, we are joined as well as throughout the year, by numerous others such as Educational Assistants, and high school and university students.
[iii] Atelierista. A teaching role at the core of the Italian Reggio Emilia approach, this is a position that extends the art teacher’s activities beyond supplying materials and demonstrating techniques. The Atelierista is a researcher with “sensitive antennae for contemporary issues” (Edwards, Gandini, & Foreman, 2012), bringing a unique perspective to school, while thoughtfully accompanying children and adults in the creative processes of learning together.
[iv] Merzbau: Merz “house” Merzbauten: plural of Merzbau; Merzbild: mixed media collage; Merzarchitektur: sculptural models for architecture; Merzbühne: Merz theatre; Merzgebiete: Merz “territories”; Merz-Säule: Merz column (see Luke 2014, index)
[v] While Schwitters created a successive Merzbau each time he was driven into exile first in Sweden, then in England, his original Merzbau is arguably the most significant not only on account of the degree of documentation that exists of it, but for its level of complexity and accomplishment.
[vi] I sometimes referred (tongue in cheek) to the construction as our “sensory overload” table.
[vii] The term, a “Proustian” recollection refers to author Marcel Proust (1871-1922) who described the childhood recollections brought on by the exquisite taste and smell of a small cake, a Madeleine.
[viii] Patricia Tarr (2001) aptly describes our vision of a typical elementary school classroom. To be fair, teachers who integrate a Reggio Emilia approach into their work, and those hoping to encourage an element of self regulation in children, have also made efforts to challenge prevalent notions of what a Kindergarten classroom might look like by reducing visual distractions and providing only what is seen as essential materials. I embrace this in principle fully, and in practice as much as I can bear though I still resist what I may unfairly refer to as “the yoga studio” aesthetic. Thus, we have “Kindergarten Merzbau”!
[ix] Tom Bedard is an Early Childhood Educator who maintains a blog that is rich with observant documentation of children at play titled “Sand and Water Tables”, http://tomsensori.blogspot.ca/
References
Bedard, Tom. (2014). Dimensions for building in and around the sensory table”,“Axioms for
sensorimotor play”. Retrieved from http://tomsensori.blogspot.ca/
Brosterman, Norman. (1997). Inventing Kindergarten. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
, , ,(Eds.). (2012). The Hundred Languages of
Children: The Reggio Emilia Experience in Transformation. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Children: The Reggio Emilia Experience in Transformation. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Efland, Arthur. (1976). “The School Art Style: A Functional Analysis,” Studies in Art
Education, v 17, n 2, 37-44.
Education, v 17, n 2, 37-44.
Gamard, Elizabeth Burns. (2000). Kurt Schwitters’ Merzbau: The Cathedral of Erotic Misery.
New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
New York: Princeton Architectural Press.
Luke, Megan. (2014). Kurt Schwitters: Space, Image, Exile. Chicago: University of Chicago
Press.
Press.
Malet, Marian (1981). Hans Arp and the Aesthetics of the Workshop. In R. Sheppard (Ed.),
New Studies in Dada: Essays and Documents (pp.67-74). Driffield: Hutton Press.
New Studies in Dada: Essays and Documents (pp.67-74). Driffield: Hutton Press.
Mindrup, Matthew. (2008). Assembling the Ineffable in Kurt Schwitters’ Architectural Models.
(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-
03252008-191510/
(Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/theses/available/etd-
03252008-191510/
Richter, Hans. (1965). Dada: Art and Anti-Art. New York: Harry N. Abrams.
Tarr, Patricia. (2001). “Aesthetic Codes in Early Childhood: What Art Educators Can Learn from
Reggio Emilia,” Art Education, v 54, n 3, 33-39.
Reggio Emilia,” Art Education, v 54, n 3, 33-39.
Webster, Gwendolen. (2007). Kurt Schwitters Merzbau. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from
http://www.academia.edu/2518110/Kurt_Schwitters_Merzbau
http://www.academia.edu/2518110/Kurt_Schwitters_Merzbau
Aaron, this is a truly beautiful article, sharing the threads of creative form between the past and within todays classroom. I am often drawn to Froebels work -especially the gifts and occupations - which offer a rich understanding of three dimensional form and allow a multitude of symbolic representations. His stick and pea work could also link to the threads..
ReplyDelete